Skip to content

Governance – Justice Mercy

Governing with Hope · Bonus reflection

Justice, Mercy and Restoring Relationships

Human dignity, responsibility and hope: a reflection for governors on care for those harmed, opportunities for change and families affected by imprisonment.

The question for governors

How do we hold together safety, accountability and hope while treating every person with dignity?

Catholic governors can ask how the school responds to harm, supports those affected and helps pupils learn responsibility. This reflection also invites sensitive attention to children whose family lives are affected by crime or imprisonment.

Read, reflect and apply. The source summary introduces the publication. The governor questions, suggested evidence, activity and prayer are EducareM’s application to Catholic school governance.
Understanding the source

Remember Me: A Catholic Approach to Criminal Justice

Remember Me is a 2024 document from the Bishops’ Conference’s Department for Social Justice. It explores criminal justice through human dignity, justice and mercy, proportionate punishment, rehabilitation and redemption. It recognises the needs of people harmed by crime, those responsible, their families and the wider community. This page applies those principles to school governance; it does not equate pupils with criminal offenders.

Suggested reading: Begin with the foreword and the sections on justice and mercy and redemption. The Bishops’ Conference’s resource page also offers further materials and a later call to action.

Challenge and support

Questions for Catholic school governors

Choose two or three questions that connect with your current priorities. Listen to leaders’ context, ask what the evidence shows and agree practical support before returning to the impact.

1. Are dignity and responsibility visible together?

Your role

Keep Catholic mission central when reviewing the school’s approach to behaviour and relationships.

Ask leaders and ourselves

Do policies distinguish a person’s worth from harmful actions? Are expectations clear, responses fair and opportunities to learn meaningful?

Evidence to consider

Policy review, anonymised examples of implementation and pupil and staff feedback.

Support

Support coherent policies, staff preparation and evaluation of whether practice reflects the mission.

2. Are those harmed heard and protected?

Your role

Oversee effective safeguarding, anti-bullying and pastoral systems.

Ask leaders and ourselves

Do pupils know how to report harm? Are their needs taken seriously? How do leaders know that follow-up improves safety and confidence?

Evidence to consider

Anonymised incident trends, pupil voice and evaluation of support.

Support

Resource timely pastoral care and clear reporting routes. Avoid judging effectiveness solely by whether a meeting or intervention took place.

3. Does support enable lasting change?

Your role

Seek assurance that responses to behaviour support safety and education.

Ask leaders and ourselves

How do leaders understand patterns and barriers, including SEND where relevant? What support helps pupils change behaviour and rebuild participation?

Evidence to consider

Patterns over time, evaluation of interventions and appropriately anonymised pupil experience.

Support

Enable staff expertise and coordinated support. Review impact while maintaining clear expectations and appropriate accountability.

4. Are families affected by imprisonment supported?

Your role

Ask whether pastoral provision responds sensitively to different family circumstances.

Ask leaders and ourselves

Can a family seek help discreetly? Are staff prepared to respond without judgement or unnecessary disclosure? How are bullying or stigma addressed?

Evidence to consider

Staff training, confidential routes to support and anonymised evaluation.

Support

Enable appropriate specialist partnerships and pastoral advice. Do not require families to identify themselves in order to evaluate the general quality of provision.

5. Is learning about justice humane and accurate?

Your role

Seek assurance about curriculum quality and suitability.

Ask leaders and ourselves

How do pupils learn about justice, mercy, responsibility and human dignity in age-appropriate ways? Do resources avoid stereotypes about prisoners or their families?

Evidence to consider

Curriculum plans, resource review and pupils’ explanations.

Support

Support subject knowledge and carefully selected visitors or partners. Protect pupils’ privacy and avoid asking them to share family experiences.

6. Do we review fairness and impact?

Your role

Scrutinise patterns and ask whether policies work as intended.

Ask leaders and ourselves

What do behaviour, attendance, complaints and pupil feedback reveal? Are particular groups affected differently, and how do leaders investigate the reasons?

Evidence to consider

Proportionate reporting, trends, reasons for decisions and follow-up on action.

Support

Agree useful indicators and a review date. Seek advice where needed and give leaders capacity to address identified weaknesses.

Keeping the purpose and responsibilities clear

School governance is a different context from criminal justice. This resource supports reflection and does not prescribe sanctions, exclusion decisions or a particular restorative programme. Protecting those harmed and following safeguarding procedures remain essential. No one should be pressured to forgive, reconcile or meet someone who harmed them. Apply current duties, diocesan protocols and the board’s delegated responsibilities.

Use proportionate, anonymised evidence for board formation. Formal complaints, individual cases and confidential concerns should follow their designated procedures.

A 15-minute board meeting activity

Read. Reflect. Decide. Return.

Before the meeting: share the suggested reading and invite members to bring one question.

  1. Pause and pray — 2 minutes. Use the prayer below and allow a short period of silence.
  2. Reflect — 3 minutes. What in the reading challenges an assumption or deepens our understanding of mission?
  3. Apply — 5 minutes. Consider an anonymised pattern of repeated harmful behaviour. Ask what assurance the board needs about protection for those harmed, fairness of process, support for change and evaluation over time. Keep individual case decisions within their designated procedures.
  4. Agree and return — 5 minutes. Record one question, one practical action within the board’s remit and a review date. Identify the evidence that would show a difference.
A useful record: “We want to understand… We will support this by… We will review the difference made on…”
For a governing board meeting

A prayer for our shared service

Merciful God, you know the wounds we carry and the harm we can cause.

Be close to those who have suffered. Bring comfort, protection and the support they need.

Help those who have done wrong accept responsibility and find a path towards change. Bless families carrying fear, separation or shame.

Guide our school to act with fairness and compassion. Give this board courage to protect, wisdom to judge carefully and hope in each person’s capacity to grow.

Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

Continue your formation

This reflection complements Families and the School and the wider themes of dignity, inclusion and belonging, with a particular focus on justice, accountability and hope.

Source: Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, Remember Me: A Catholic Approach to Criminal Justice (2024). The source publication remains the work of its authors. The school governance application and prayer are EducareM’s reflection.

For further formation, explore the programme diary or bespoke support for your governing board.

Last reviewed: 17 October 2026 · © EducareM · Supporting Catholic education and leadership

Accessibility Toolbar

Update cookie preferences