EducareM • Catholic mission in practice
Reviewing Catholic Mission and Impact
What does our Catholic mission change for pupils, staff and families?
A practical approach to listening, reflection and improvement: recognise the good, examine whose experience is different, and agree the next faithful step.
For school leaders, governors, chaplaincy teams and every member of the school community, from early years to sixth form.
Begin with the mission entrusted to us
A Catholic school centres its educational mission on Jesus Christ. It seeks the flourishing of the whole person: knowledge and wisdom, relationships and responsibility, prayer and service. Each person has God-given dignity; the common good asks us to consider how our decisions affect others, especially those who encounter disadvantage or exclusion.
Mission review therefore reaches into lessons, expectations, relationships, leadership, budgets and daily routines. Ask how faith shapes the purpose of education and the way people are treated, as well as the school’s explicitly religious life.
For pupils
What helps pupils learn well, encounter Christ, grow in understanding, exercise responsibility and experience their dignity in daily school life?
For staff
How does the mission shape professional judgement, formation, working relationships, care and the contribution of every role?
For families
How do parents and carers experience welcome, partnership, respectful communication and support for their child’s education and formation?
Catholic grounding: The Catholic School, particularly §§33–35; Gravissimum educationis, particularly §§1, 3 and 8.
Move from an activity to a change in experience
A calendar of celebrations, training attendance or a fundraising total tells us what happened. To understand impact, ask what people learned, experienced or were enabled to do, and whether that change lasted.
| Step | Question | Example: dignity and participation |
|---|---|---|
| Mission commitment | What do we believe and seek? | Every pupil’s contribution matters. |
| Practice | What did we change? | Offer supported, varied roles in preparing prayer. |
| Experience | What was it like for those involved? | Pupils describe having a meaningful choice and useful preparation. |
| Outcome | What is different now? | Previously overlooked pupils contribute confidently and can explain their role. |
| Evidence | How do we know, and what challenges our view? | Compare participation records, pupil conversations and observations across several celebrations. |
| Next step | What should we sustain or improve? | Keep the preparation support; address barriers reported by pupils still unable to participate. |
Listen
Gather specific accounts from people with different experiences. Include those who rarely volunteer feedback.
Look
Examine ordinary practice, pupil work and existing records. Check whether what people describe matches what happens.
Test the conclusion
Look for exceptions, changes over time and other possible explanations. Describe the strength and limits of the evidence.
Listening activities that lead to action
Explain the purpose, how comments will be used and when people will hear back. Offer accessible language, translation, communication support and different ways to respond. Participation should be voluntary. Explain confidentiality and its limits; handle safeguarding concerns immediately through school procedures rather than waiting for a review meeting.
1. Early years and younger pupils — a belonging walk
Time: 10–15 minutes in a familiar space with a trusted adult.
Invite children to point, draw, use photographs, communicate through their usual support, or show places where they feel welcome. Avoid requiring spoken answers.
- Show me a place where someone helps you.
- What happens when you need help or feel left out?
- What do you like doing when we pray together?
- Is there something you would like adults to change?
Review: Record children’s actual words or communication, separate these from adult interpretation, and compare patterns across several children. Check the environment and routines they identify.
2. Primary pupils — the everyday mission map
Time: 25 minutes with a small, varied group.
Map a school day: arrival, lessons, play, lunch, prayer and home time. Ask pupils to mark a moment when someone’s dignity was respected and a moment that could be better.
- Tell us about a time an adult listened and something changed.
- How does RE help you understand something more deeply?
- Who gets to make decisions or take responsibility here?
- What happens when someone makes a mistake or is excluded?
Review: Include pupils with different communication needs and experiences. Ask for examples before accepting a general judgement such as “everyone is kind”. Agree one change pupils can help review.
3. Secondary and sixth form — mission under pressure
Time: 30 minutes; offer written contributions before discussion.
Use one realistic tension: examination pressure, a costly enrichment activity, a harmful online incident, or unequal access to leadership.
- Which Catholic commitments should guide this decision?
- Where do our stated values and lived experience align or diverge?
- Whose voice is absent from decisions?
- How have prayer, RE or service helped you reflect and act?
- What responsibility could pupils hold with appropriate preparation?
Review: Invite pupils beyond established councils and chaplaincy groups. Let pupils challenge assumptions respectfully. Return with the decision, its reasons and a date to review its effect.
4. Every member of staff — a real decision review
Time: 20 minutes in mixed-role groups, with another route for colleagues unable to attend.
Include teachers, teaching assistants, office colleagues, site teams and lunchtime staff. Each person brings an ordinary situation: greeting a distressed parent, supporting a pupil, correcting behaviour or balancing competing demands.
- What did the mission ask of us in this situation?
- What helped us act well? What made it difficult?
- Which formation, guidance, time or resources would help?
- Do colleagues in every role experience respect and a voice?
Review: Record themes without attributing sensitive comments. Agree one practical response and identify who will check whether it helped. Use a confidential route for individual employment concerns.
5. Parents and carers — three questions, several routes
Time: a five-minute conversation, translated message, telephone call or short paper response.
- When has this school helped your child or family feel known and supported?
- What makes communication or participation difficult?
- What one change would strengthen our partnership?
Reach beyond event attendees. Offer flexible contact times, interpreters and accessible formats. Invite families of different faiths or none to describe their experience of the school’s Catholic identity and welcome.
Review: Note which groups and circumstances remain underrepresented. Follow up barriers such as cost, work patterns, language, disability and previous negative experiences without labelling families “hard to reach”.
6. Parish, community partners and governors — mutual responsibility
Time: 30 minutes, drawing on pupil, staff and family findings.
- What do we each understand the school’s mission to require?
- Where does our partnership support formation and belonging?
- How do service projects reflect the priorities and dignity of the people involved?
- Which school decisions need challenge, resources or a different approach?
Review: Agree responsibilities on both sides. Governors ask whether leaders’ conclusions are supported by evidence and whether the improvement plan reaches people whose experience is least positive.
Six reflective reviews
Choose one or two themes each term. Use existing evidence and a small amount of purposeful listening. For each theme, record a strength, a concern, a reasoned judgement and a next step.
1. Curriculum and religious education
How does the curriculum develop knowledge, judgement and a Catholic understanding of the human person? Is RE taught with ambition, accuracy and depth?
Look at: pupil work over time, curriculum choices, classroom explanations and pupil accounts. Ask whether pupils can explain their learning and whether support preserves ambition.
Possible action: review one sequence with subject leaders; improve access and revisit pupil understanding after teaching.
2. Dignity, inclusion and relationships
Where do SEND, disadvantage, disability, language or cultural barriers affect learning and belonging? How are correction, restoration and care experienced?
Look at: participation, attendance patterns, responses to incidents, access arrangements and accounts from affected pupils and families.
Possible action: remove a specific barrier, agree support with those affected and check the resulting experience.
3. Prayer and liturgy
Are celebrations faithfully prepared, age appropriate and accessible? Can pupils engage meaningfully with Scripture, silence and prayer?
Look at: preparation, observation, pupil explanations and feedback across phases. Consider how prayer connects with daily decisions.
Possible action: strengthen preparation for one type of celebration and review it with pupils and staff.
4. Staff formation and working life
Does formation help colleagues understand Church teaching and apply it to their responsibilities? Do everyday decisions reflect dignity and the common good?
Look at: examples of changed practice, induction feedback, access across roles and workload implications.
Possible action: adapt a short formation session to a real shared challenge and revisit the practical commitment.
5. School, home and parish
Do families experience partnership in their child’s education? Are transition, faith at home and sacramental links communicated clearly and sensitively?
Look at: family accounts, communication routes, parish dialogue and barriers to participation.
Possible action: co-design one accessible approach with families who rarely attend current events.
6. Pupil leadership, ministry and service
Do pupils receive formation and meaningful responsibility? Does action serve the common good and respect the agency of others?
Look at: who participates, pupil decision-making, partner feedback and reflection on Catholic social teaching.
Possible action: widen a role, provide preparation and review what pupils and partners say changed.
What a reasoned review can look like
These are illustrative examples, not claims about a particular school.
Primary example — families experiencing welcome
Initial finding: Families describe a warm school, but several new parents cannot explain who to contact. Attendance at the welcome evening is low among families working shifts.
Action: Office staff and parents redesign the welcome information in plain language, offer translated support and provide short telephone appointments at different times.
Follow-up evidence: Ask the same questions after six weeks, include families who missed appointments, and check whether routine enquiries reach the appropriate colleague more easily.
Judgement: If contact routes are better understood, recognise improved access. Do not infer that trust or belonging has improved for every family from appointment attendance alone. Continue listening to those still reporting difficulty.
Secondary example — responsibility that reaches beyond the usual volunteers
Initial finding: Ministry roles are held mainly by confident pupils. Other pupils report unclear selection criteria and insufficient preparation.
Action: Explain roles openly, invite different forms of contribution, provide supported preparation and involve pupils in reviewing access.
Follow-up evidence: Examine who participates over a term, observe responsibilities in practice and ask new participants what they learned and what remains difficult.
Judgement: More diverse participation is an early indicator. Stronger evidence of formation includes pupils explaining the purpose of their responsibilities and exercising them thoughtfully. Check whether pupil proposals influence decisions.
Whole-school example — formation influencing relationships
Initial finding: Staff understand the language of dignity but describe inconsistent responses when pupils make mistakes.
Action: Use a short formation session grounded in Catholic teaching, examine a real scenario and agree a practical approach consistent with school behaviour and safeguarding procedures.
Follow-up evidence: Gather pupil and staff accounts, review ordinary interactions and examine relevant incident patterns over time.
Judgement: Describe changes supported by several sources. A reduction in recorded incidents alone may reflect recording changes, so check interpretation before attributing improvement to formation.
Turn reflection into a focused improvement plan
Choose a small number of priorities that matter. Make each one specific enough to act on and review. Identify the mission commitment, the experience to improve, an accountable lead and the resources needed.
| Planning element | Example |
|---|---|
| Mission and priority | Respect each pupil’s dignity by widening access to meaningful ministry responsibilities. |
| Starting point | Review last term’s roles and pupil accounts. Identify who is absent and the barriers they describe; record actual numbers before setting a target. |
| Actions | Publish clear roles; invite varied contributions; provide preparation and communication support; review access with pupils. |
| Lead and resources | Chaplaincy lead with pupil representatives and SEND lead; scheduled preparation time and accessible materials. |
| Timeline | Weeks 1–2: listen and establish baseline. Weeks 3–5: prepare and implement. Week 6: review initial experience. End of term: check sustained participation. |
| Success indicators | Previously excluded pupils can access chosen roles, explain their purpose and report useful support. Observe meaningful responsibility and check which barriers remain. |
| Review decision | Continue, adapt or stop particular approaches according to evidence. Report findings to pupils and governors and agree the next review date. |
A reusable review record
- Commitment: Which aspect of Catholic mission guides this priority?
- Finding: What is working, what needs attention, and for whom?
- Evidence: What supports this judgement? Whose voice is missing?
- Action: What will change, who will lead, and what support is needed?
- Intended difference: What should people experience or be able to do?
- Review: When and how will we check progress and unintended effects?
- Response: What will we sustain, adapt or discontinue?
Questions for governors
- Which decisions show that Catholic mission shapes priorities and resources?
- What evidence challenges the school’s most positive account?
- How are pupils, staff and families with less positive experiences represented?
- Are leaders addressing the causes of barriers as well as their symptoms?
- Is improvement manageable, resourced and reviewed for its effect on people?
Connect reflection with relevant inspection expectations
Use the framework that applies to your school’s country, phase and sector, alongside diocesan requirements. The activities on this page support professional reflection; inspection judgements are made through the relevant official framework.
Catholic Schools Inspectorate — England and Wales
Review Catholic Life and Mission, Religious Education, and Prayer and Liturgy together, considering pupils’ experience, provision and leadership. Use current documents and diocesan advice when preparing Catholic self-evaluation.
- CSI school resources, including the Catholic Self-Evaluation Document
- CSI Inspection Handbook — September 2026, version 5.0
- Prayer and Liturgy Directory
The listening activities above are school improvement activities. During a CSI inspection, the lead inspector issues the official parent and staff survey links; schools should follow those arrangements.
Ofsted — maintained schools and academies in England
Read the current toolkit and accompanying information for the precise expectations. The prompts below suggest where a mission review can inform wider self-evaluation.
| Evaluation area | Mission review question |
|---|---|
| Safeguarding | Do people know how to raise concerns, and do responses protect pupils effectively? |
| Inclusion | Whose access, learning or belonging is affected by barriers, and what changes help? |
| Curriculum and teaching | How do ambition, knowledge and thoughtful teaching reach every pupil? |
| Achievement | What do pupils learn and achieve, and where do different experiences need attention? |
| Attendance and behaviour | How do expectations, support and relationships help pupils attend and participate? |
| Personal development and well-being | How do pupils develop judgement, responsibility, relationships and meaningful voice? |
| Early years | How do young children experience care, learning, communication and belonging? |
| Post-16 provision | How does formation support growing independence, discernment and future pathways? |
| Leadership and governance | How do leaders and governors act on evidence, use resources and sustain improvement? |
Ofsted: school inspection toolkit, operating guides and information
Independent schools
Use the inspectorate and standards applicable to your school. For schools inspected by ISI, consult its current framework alongside Catholic inspection and diocesan requirements.
Scotland
Use SCES guidance for Catholic school reflection and the applicable national inspection and self-evaluation framework.
Wales
Use Estyn’s guidance for your sector alongside Catholic inspection and diocesan expectations. Interpret evidence within the Welsh educational context.
Official links checked 9 October 2026. Check the linked sources for subsequent updates and use the version applicable to your school.
A manageable annual rhythm
Autumn: listen and discern
Revisit the mission, review existing evidence and invite different voices. Agree one or two priorities, starting points and intended differences.
Spring: act and review
Implement changes, support staff and pupils, and check early experiences. Address unintended barriers and explain what has changed.
Summer: judge and renew
Compare the starting point with current evidence. Celebrate supported improvements, acknowledge remaining concerns and agree the next year’s focus.
Build this rhythm into existing leadership, staff and governor meetings. Keep a concise record of decisions and evidence. For printing, open the review panels you want to include before using your browser’s print command.
A prayer before reviewing our mission
Lord Jesus Christ, help us to see our school with truth and love. Give us ears to hear those whose voices are easily missed, wisdom to recognise what brings life, and courage to change what diminishes dignity. Guide our decisions, strengthen our service, and help every person entrusted to us flourish. Amen.
An original prayer for this resource.
Explore EducareM resources · Governing with Hope · Contact EducareM
These original activities and examples are offered for adaptation by schools. Refer to official Church, diocesan and inspection guidance for authoritative requirements.